country. That means issues of power, status, resources, culture, politics, and social structures play
center stage as the COVID-19 pandemic emerged, unfolded and continues.
The COVID-19 pandemic highlights the role that institutions, communities, and the public
play in the implementation of policy and the need for an engaged and responsive citizenry.
Differential compliance with stay-at-home orders, social distancing and other policy guidelines,
combined with power and resource imbalances, emphasize how social and political cleavages
shape the effectiveness of policies combatting the pandemic. Effective societal response relies on
nimble political and social structures that can absorb information, and create, enact, and administer
responsive policy. These concerns matter within institutions at the local, state, and national level.
Effective responses also rely on the public to acquire and assess information, and to be engaged in
their communities and the political environment—in other words, to be “good citizens” of an
informed society. Yet, we expect that the existing social, political and cultural chasms; as well as
inequalities in information and resources, are shaping how people and their government respond
to the pandemic. We recognize that a variety of social resources and structures, including
institutions, education, power, status, geography, beliefs, economic inequality, networks, and
cultural capital, play a role in pandemic response.
The magnitude of the disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, and the governmental
responses that follow, have sweeping political and social consequences, which we are just
beginning to study. Additionally, citizens’ experiences with the pandemic may shape subsequent
behaviors, such as strategies for collecting and processing of information, trust in government,
voting behavior, and civic engagement. Likewise, the pandemic and related governmental
responses have important consequences on existing social and political inequalities, including race,
class, and region of residence.
In this issue, we invite theoretical and empirical papers which enhance our initial
understanding of the social and political impacts of the COVID-19 outbreak. Our aim is to
highlight outstanding early research on: (1) how social and political dynamics shape responses to
the pandemic; and (2) how the pandemic itself alters social and political dynamics for individuals,
communities and institutions. This includes research exemplifying the interplay among politics
and policy; information exchange; economics; psychology; social structures, including networks
and institutions; power and status; and public behavior in the United States. We welcome research
from across the social sciences, including communications, economics, education, organizational
behavior, political science, psychology, and sociology. Papers may employ a variety of methods
and data, including both quantitative and qualitative. We are particularly interested in studies that
deepen our understanding of social institutions in times of crisis and change. In the United States,
the decentralized nature of the pandemic response created cleavages between regions, urban and
rural areas, demographic populations, and other groups leading to significant power and status